nm5447: right what do we have for er who wants territory and who wants sex you know about degrees of freedom we might get to the back of you but that serves you right for sitting at the back with all the troublemakers what would you like to do territory or sex su: nm5447: what see if i said mating behaviour you'd probably've said territory but sex has got that works hasn't it so you're going to do sex and right the the the task at hand here is to think of how you do it how you space yourself out what territories mean to you and modesty forbids me from extending that to the other topic but i mean displays rituals how you do it the sort of key how it figures in your life so that both of those things getting off with people making mistakes and i'd like you to think about any of those examples what continuities there are between you and the rest of the animal world is what you're doing just the same as just the same as what animals are doing really mm you know they're quite homollegous the-, they're basic forms of the same essential way of doing something even if it's only a fruit bat er something like that or is it just something that's quite different what you're seeing here is only by analogy or or by some loose connection the same in inverted commas as what animals are doing and what you're doing is something for uniquely human ends in a uniquely human way so it's just to trace out the continuities and the discontinuities so you're going to do sex or mating behaviour and where's the next group start is that oh you're another group er are you alright what do you want to do su: we'll do territory nm5447: they're going to do territory then i suppose you could do territory separately can i do go round like that alternating so you're doing territory if you've got if you really object you can do the other it doesn't really matter so you're going to do sex you're going to do territory what do you want to do sex territory or sex su: sex nm5447: you're going to do sex well we're two up from sex what'll you do su: sex nm5447: sex sex sex [laughter] see me afterwards [laughter] right what do you want to do sorry what do you want to do [laughter] whe-, where's the next who's the next group are you a new one what do you want to do se-, alright we're looking a bit bit low on territory at the moment su: territory nm5447: territory good for you nm5447: do territory alright so there's two groups at the back which one do you want to do su: yeah we'll do territory nm5447: territory right that's alright yeah we've got probably one up on territory but that's alright we've got we've got some examples of each and then all i'm going to do give you ten minutes quarter of an hour to sort of think of examples then i'd just like to go round see what sort of examples you've come up with and what what sort of conclusions we can draw okay then anyone got any questions put your hand up or shout out and i'll come round otherwise i'll just leave you to get on with it nm5447: how are you getting on do you think you've got enough to be getting on with i'd like to hear you know a bit from each group now er plenty of time er we are not ready to do it would you like another couple of minutes to jot down a few ideas or do you think you've got a few things to say you only need sort of to have a couple of what you think are telling examples of worth mentioning somewhere there may seem to be continuity but there is none or some where there seems to be a discontinuity but basically sort of saying how do you feel er go on er just er just stick your hand up if you'd like to go on for another couple of minutes er alright okay another couple of minutes then er start with territories and territoriality states claiming space things we do starting starting from the back are you a territory group i forgot now sf5452: yeah nm5447: could you give us give us one of your one of the topics that you thought of then initially er sf5452: mm about how both animals and humans mark out their own territory but in slightly different ways so like humans it could be mm their own room like at university you have your name on the door and that's like stating it's your territory and you may shut your door which means you know you want your own personal space whereas you know mm animals mark out their territory by like weeing and by senses and things nm5447: yeah did any of the other territory groups sor-, focus on that the sort of marking of one's space and the marking of ones territories none none of the other none of you picked that the other groups doing territories how would you sm5448: when we first come to uni er kitchen everyone has to have their own cupboard and everyone names their own food an-, and that's i don't know if that's normal or if that's just selfishness that you don't want to share any food or want other people stealing it but su: yeah sm5448: you have a problem with trying to decide whether library er if someone's sitting there and this other chair is available if you go and sit next to them that's er er nm5447: go on sm5448: it's more that you when you're you're brought up without other right situations to do that say from a pub or something and er you go up and talk to them it's the nature and that's okay but in a situation like that it's not really acceptable i'm not sure if it's inbuilt or not nm5447: that's that's a table there it's got six chairs around it someone with and someone with broad shoulders and curly hair working i mean i mean you're right if you were if you were in the library and you approached a table and er anybody you approached it and there's someone working there which seat would you go for nm5447: anybody think of it nm5447: yeah okay i mean B B or C this this is more distant but this is orientated away which is another way of making a distance er you can sort of create more distance from you and someone else by sort of turning away because er mm and then if if you know someone came and sat in A or E you'd feel miffed wouldn't you it's a bit like i guess going home on a bus if you're upstairs on a bus and there's only you're the only one up there and there's somebody else comes up it's not just you know they're not they don't just come and sit beside you even if they sat in the seat in front of you or the seat behind you alone it would still be awkward you'd wonder why i mean i guess it's it's a sort of expectation that you will maximise the distance between you and anyone else if it's a private situation isn't there there's a sort of norm that's an agreement that you do that would you not would you not say er if you wer-, if you were going into someone you knew in the library but there was still still working in the library somebody you knew which seat do you think you'd go for nm5447: you would sit opposite them would you if you knew them then you'd go and sit near to them cause you'd want to talk to them rather than work i suppose [laughter] if it was a meal like where would you sit cause you have a meal with you and then you've gone there to-, together and somebody's sat down in where which seat would you pick ss: D yeah nm5447: so yeah or ss: E nm5447: or E i think it depends how big the table is if it's a very big table i think you'd go you'd probably go for E wouldn't you but if it was a sort of smaller table you'd go for D again if it was something if you were going to debate or negotiate with someone what would you do ss: D E nm5447: yeah you'd sit opposite someone there's something about confronting if it was an interview you walk into a room and you're going for an interview and the person interviewing you was sitting in that seat which seat would you take this would be part of the interview of course it'd be crucial you picked the right seat which one would you go for ss: nm5447: which one ss: nm5447: yeah i think so there's an element of sort of confrontation in an interview isn't there i think if you went for E or went for A A would be the cool one to go for [laughter] i mean you might it depends how they there's something about intentions isn't there i mean one of the one of the pointers in this there's something about expressing your intentions when you when you have to go and sort of space yourself next to somebody else but also there's something about your entitlement you are entitled to some sort of to expect the other person to sort of keep some sort of distance from you i mean the question is is that the same as is that the same as what animals are doing when you talk about territories we were talking about marking territories weren't we and er i mean i suppose people do they sling their coats and books all over the table to keep everybody away and and compartments so that's if that's the equivalent of weeing do you think that's what it is sort of hanging jackets and sticking books do you think that really is the same as animals do with marking out territories su: they mark out territory for different reasons nm5447: to make sure they've got enough of an area to sort of to get food and things like that yeah you see i think that's a crucial difference actually we-, we-, we're using the word territory in this context in a in a sort of metaphorical way really it isn't really a territory it's a space around us for trying to sort of make sure that the norms are agreed to i mean we want that sort of space we don't want people sort of in our faces whereas what animals are doing is something about something mu-, i mean they're not everywhere in that territory for a start are they i mean i guess i guess there is a sort of an analogy here rather than a homology i think for any otherany other comments on territory and space cause it is crucial it isit is a very important thing to consider really whe-, when we're talking about space and when we're talking about territory and if what we're doing is is fundamentally doing what animals do or whether there are human needs here sm5449: with with human needs its cause er different like societies have different amounts of space like British are very very reserved and they probably would want a lot more space than a lot of other cultures which are more open to each other nm5447: that's a good point as well isn't it that that there are there's cultural variation in how much space we can lay claim to and how much space we want not very not only for sort of interactions i mean these usually assume that different cultures have different preferred distances for interacting from or doing various transactions er but even within a culture i mean some people are quite happy to live in very crowded conditions flats cities other people couldn't bear that there seem to be a lot of individual differences in how much space which is important make it sound like a a human thing expressing some sort of individual preference did any-, anybody else have anything to say about that the sort of cultural differences even within a society within a nation let alone across cultures sf5453: looking at the difference with age as well because children require less space than adults a child will come and sit next to you in that situation nm5447: yes would you would you agree with that that children seem to require less space and are less worried about the ownership of space not always children can be quite private about what they're doing and not want to be too i think i think that's right why why do you think that is then why is there a difference between adults and children sm5449: adults just learn what's to be expected what's right well not right but just the kind of norm nm5447: adults learn what's expected and what's the norm i think i'd agree with that any other er adults sm5451: adults are more likely to so-, sort of come up with communications of something like if someone like goes to the toilet next to you like the next urinal there you might be a bit suspicious [laughter] nm5447: it's so unfair women wouldn't have this problem [laughter] sm5451: be suspicious nm5447: there sort of asymmetries er er yeah i there are all sorts of asymmetries here aren't there about if a if a man goes and sits next to a woman in some public space as opposed to vice versa yeah mm what about this adult thing i mean you say that adults learn there is a norm is it not the case adults have have more to protect do you think the privacy the you know is something that you just have to try hard to maintain because it's more important to you i should think the maintenance of oneself as an adult is a sort of more more together more complicated process than as a child maybe adults you know desire that space more you know respite from having to interact with other people is perhaps more necessary they're certainly more aware of the norms as well i mean children don't they have a nice naivety about most social norms and we find that quite interesting quite attractive most of the time and we know we we smile and laugh at children's inability to behave socially whereas we get fed up with adults doing it usually let's get let's have another group move on from territory now now you were you a sex group or a territory group give this as an example er where are we on this next row the penultimate row are they i think you were doing territory were you sf5454: we were talking about whether it was mm inbuilt or not er we're about whether children about toys how they can be possessive sometimes with toys nm5447: right sf5454: and we didn't know whether that was a problem cause you will only see that at a certain age whether that's something that they learned nm5447: mm yes sf5454: or whether it was because it is a natural thing nm5447: i think to shade territoriality into possessiveness is an interesting step to take and i think it is relevant to human beings and i think a lot of what perhaps it's the case that a lot of what we construe as territoriality is as is as much about possessiveness you know my territory as s-, s-, something you own and it's a space you own or an object you own yes go on anything more about that then sf5454: er and we were talking also about cultures and whether like some people think that maybe it di-, how territoriality you are is to do with your culture and that er so it's probably learned we were saying maybe it's initially inbuilt but then because of your culture some cultures go away from territoriality and some towards it more nm5447: yeah yes i think one one way of sort of tying this up as well is to think of the space you claim around you as something that you can personalise and claim as your sp-, your own space and then it becomes an extension of you an extension of your own personality something that says something of you and everybody looks you know your-, yourse-, yourself and your identity doesn't stop at your skin it certainly includes your clothes and it might include space that's unique to yours i mean you've all moved into most of you have moved into your rooms in a residence and i guess you've done various things to personalise them so that it is your space and it speaks of you and is an extension of yourself you sort of establish yourself you know not not just by what you look like and who you know et cetera but but through a little bit of space that's uniquely yours you know someone comes in and insults your room in this sense they've insulted you and lecturers do it as well you can see it in their rooms my room's tastefully decorated as an extension of myself [laughter] i can see a few of my tutees around here nodding vigorously but er you know it is it is you know so space is space you can claim a bit of space that can be uniquely yours as well and i don't know whether any of you were considering this particularly in the light of recent experiences i guess you all have rooms here you have your cupboards in the kitchen as well i suppose which is i guess that's not so much an externalisation of yourself as a space of convenience / that you need that's sort of practical but you put some your name written in a silly way on it or painted or coloured or anything like that has anyone personalised their part of public spaces sf5455: nobody er in our kitchen nm5447: nobody does no what about on on doors you know in the slot where you put your names on your doors some people have nodded though y-, y-, yours is printed is it twelve point times and do you have do you write your names on the on your door sf5455: no nm5447: yeah what about inside though what've you got sf5455: put your name inside the door [laughter] nm5447: i mean i i just mean do you consider it as something that mm it it is a space it's not your territory but it's it's a space that you own to use as an expression of yourself as well as a place where you live and sleep and all the other things store your clothes and your books and do your psychology essays sf5455: yeah i suppose so nm5447: right so so there there is there so territory sort of shades in human senses shades in sort of spaces which are extensions of ourselves which is not what ani-, animals are doing any animals think territory my bit of the savannah or the woodlands which speaks well of me you know that's not sort of on the cards right other other territory groups where are we coming anybody else in the penultimate row did territories okay the middle row the middle rank did you what did you do sex territories or sex sex what about the second row from the front well you've said yes you said any other any other comments about territories then sm5450: yeah in the s-, society i mean you know you've got different countries for example you know they kind of that's their territory nm5447: yeah sm5450: they've got a need to belong to a certain country English and we like that nm5447: yeah sm5450: and we clearly mark boundaries and to an extent in in countries as well you know you've got people say from Manchester or London or so and so and they're quite proud of that fact and nm5447: that is a good point there are sort of territories nested within other territories aren't there that space is you know your room your house your university or your street your your town or region your country that's a good point er are there they're much more conceptual things aren't they you know they're they're based on ideas yeah what were you doing were you doing sex or territories sf5456: sex nm5447: what about what were you doing i've forgotten sf5457: we were doing territories nm5447: you're in the same group as them sf5457: yes nm5447: okay are there any any other things that we've missed going round any any points you've raised about the way we space ourselves out the way we marked mark territories the way we claim space the way we use space anything anything else we've missed are are your conclusions having thought about this then that that we are rather animal like or do you think we are rather unanimal like in in the way we use that word territory is it who thinks on the whole if you had to plump one way or the other we're fundamentally beastly we're we you know we're still rather like animals in the way we we use space implied territories who thinks that no one yeah go on be proud be proud to be a er go on see how it goes er interesting social phenomenon shark feeding frenzy one goes in everybody goes up okay and who thinks that no there are you know unavoidable discontinuities and that what we're seeing is only very superficially by analogy animal let's have a look how wonderful really nicely split on that i like that cause it's both it's the answer i guess the answer has to be both we are both you know the product of evolution is sti-, you know still there and how how we need space functionally but also we're we're something quite separate which just makes it more complicated but more interesting okay let's let's go for a good quarter of an hour to hear what there is on the er mating behaviour so let's start anyone in the back row i've forgotten now you were both doing territory were you su: yeah nm5447: okay so we're in the penultimate row starting with you you were doing sex right no one in your group territories you're all saying territories now aren't you [laughter] did you do you what are you doing mating behaviour and sex sf5458: yeah nm5447: great okay let's ha-, have a pick out something new one particular issues which you thought was interesting either demonstrating a discontinuity or a continuity with with the animals sf5458: er the research about homosexuals was quite interesting about the mm different libidos between males and females and how with the homosexuals it was assumed that because they didn't conform to the norms as far as the mm with regards to having sex with males and females then they wouldn't conform to the norms about how often they did nm5447: how sf5458: often nm5447: often sf5458: yeah that the er i read it somewhere nm5447: okay yeah sf5458: but mm i can't explain it very well but they were saying that females have lower libidos than males so they kind of put put the brakes on and er although lesbians have sex just as often as heterosexual females er gay men have a much higher partner turnover rate about ten to a hundred times that of heterosexual males because they haven't got the females putting the brakes on nm5447: well i mean you you say partner turnover is a function of frequency of of sex then cause it is that the implication you're just having so much sex you're ready for someone else much much quicker is that the implication then i'm not sure about that but it do-, go on sf5458: well it was a piece of research i can't remember the exact details of it but er because of the er or something cause you know males like to spread their seed and nm5447: that raises sf5458: pregnancy nm5447: i mean that raises a more general point about the asymmetries in participation sex and display and mating which some people assert are there in human behaviour and also seem to be there in similar ways in animal behaviour and mm you might put that forward as a continuity about men being basically more promiscuous men being less committed and and being dominant and doing the chasing all sorts of things like that there are lots of there are lots of ways which men in humans are sort of typify this being different from female in the in the roles they play in mating behaviour ritual displays and some sociobiologists people looking for biological explanations have said this is fundamentally what animals do would you did you did you develop that at all mm have a view on that sf5458: well we also talked about er the different reasons for sex between animals and humans er how in animals it's very much more reproductive reasons which is why the males of the species always have got elaborate colours er and fancy sort of displays for the female but in humans er it's not so much about reproduction any more it's got like a another meaning sort of in a relationship nm5447: mm sf5458: er and we talked about the differences and like how they sort of developed separately nm5447: yeah it is i mean we have appetites we have to we have to want to do what we need to do otherwise our D-N-A doesn't get replicated we have to like eating we have to like drinking we have to like sex otherwise we wouldn't do it and we'd die all the species that didn't get that sorted are no longer here on the planet and all the species that really like doing those things presumably are still around and i guess it's a human achievement to educate taste and educate sound so we like listening to stuff and music and art and and sex is another appetite that has been has been educated from the kama sutra onwards and and and sold as well it has a has a commercial value anything people want will be turned into a commercial value you will realise that and that's that's something that i don't think you see in the animal world that elaboration of the pleasures of sensation and sort of conflicts as well i mean most of the Freudian psychology is about conflict between a biological urge and and a social a set of social conventions to control them to organise society in the face of it so i reckon that's a discontinuity between animals perhaps you know that an animal is is direct expression and the only thing that inhibits animals are a sort of other species fighting and threatening that they can't run fast enough and so on it's not quite the you and me situation as far as i can see anyway okay what's the next group anybody else on that row oh we've done that row haven't we you're all doing territory the middle row who's no you're in the same group aren't you er were you in that group were you doing su: no nm5447: i can't remember you ought to have coloured shirts so we can better see what groups what did you any particular er sf5459: er we kind of picked up more on the physical attractiveness because er right and we were saying about how modern like really really slim one is kind of a break from a built-in evolutionary per-, perspective because if we were thinking in in evolutionary terms we'd expect men to like ones with like wide hips and big breasts and stuff but the slim shape doesn't fit in with the whole reproduction theme and er also the difference between er how in the animal world it's er men who do all of the strutting about with the fancy colours and what have you and then like in humans it tends to be women who put on the show more changing su: nm5447: well that's i mean that's a good that's a good point again that's a good area for looking attraction and attractiveness and whether we see the same thing happening in animals as humans your example about thin narrow narrow- hipped you said women could what about the argument that what's really on show there is a tendency for for youthfulness and their fertility and reproductivity to be attractive and that's what you're really going for er that then that would be a more biologically reproductively orientated argument wouldn't it th-, that sf5460: could i just say something with the slim and er it's actually been suggested that males go for women with a slim waist because it show they're not shows that they're not already impregnated by another man and so they're not wasting their time by trying to make them pregnant nm5447: sounds far fetched [laughter] sf5460: no it's not really nm5447: no i know they wouldn't publish it if it is er no i it's possible and it it doesn't seem very feasible does it i mean i guess i mean if i happened to buy a biological argument i'd be more impressed with the sort of we go for youthfulness and we go for health and therefore you know things that things that we find attractive are expressions of health and expressions of youthfulness but i was wondering whether that is the case in human beings whether that is what people find attractive i don't know er what about what females find attractive in males what's that bright feathers sf5461: says something about strength er you know characteristics of strength nm5447: is it strength is that what's attractive sf5461: i think so nm5447: strength sf5462: they reckon it er always go for a man that's more capable of providing for you and your child and that er su: the difference between er nm5447: that's a diff-, slightly different thing or do you think do you think that is what when you don't think it's strength in a man sf5462: well you look for both don't you really but it for some reason i reckon that particularly you'll go for a male that's stronger both physically and mentally to provide for you nm5447: mentally and physically sf5462: yes nm5447: right sf5462: i mean in humans more than animals nm5447: mm mm would anyone is that is that your common view er so is that isn't this a continuity between animal and human behaviour then er is this is this based on what we see in animals sm5449: similarly it's going to be difficult obviously nm5447: can you hear that at the back sm5449: in that it's just we go for the same things but in a different context such as animals will go for strength in terms of protection whereas female humans will go for strength represented by wealth good job et cetera it's the same sort of thing it's just that sf5463: socioeconomic crap thats nm5447: you'll have to speak up so they can hear at the back sorry sf5463: humans socioeconomic factors they're important because animals don't have money basically they don't have and that sort of er and so what we were saying before about males having the brightly-coloured feathers for display humans do do that to an extent but it's more look how much money i've got rather than look how beautiful my feathers are nm5447: your Versace suits sf5463: yeah nm5447: well there's a good point made there about there's you know there's a socio-, a socioeconomic context a symbolic context in which people participate and what you want to see is people who are successful in that and so in some senses it is a type of display it is a promise of being good in that context effective and being confident but it's not about it's not necessarily about strength it's just about being effective and confident su: it's about power nm5447: and power if you like yeah capacity in that sense sm5450: and humans have a choice i suppose animals normally the female has to cope with whichever male happens to win or be the strongest she hasn't got the choice humans tend to chose their partners nm5447: you feel you feel humans have a choice do you sm5450: yes nm5447: right yeah that's a good point humans have a choice you can go your own way and it is interesting that people different people like different things it isn't just the biggest or the biggest car there are other other things it is interesting in the animal world that some it seems to me that some of the things that are selected in sexual displays are really functional things like sort of speed strength and there are other examples in the animal world of what s-, selects like peacocks there's nothing er there's nothing functional about having all those feathers and that big display i mean you aren't going to be better ab-, able the better to breed because of that are you it seems a puzzle i mean i don't know the answer to that why is it that you can go down that evolutionary cul-de-sac or that evolutionary path sm5449: isn't it that peacocks use them for intimidation and therefore the better the animal can intimidate the less likely it is to get killed or er nm5447: right but what intimidates a peahen might not be the same thing that intimidate-, in-, intimidates a predator i suppose but maybe it does well perhaps you're right perhaps they don't have many predators perhaps they're pretty safe sf5458: is it so hard to nm5447: possibly sf5458: nm5447: yeah could be sf5458: like with chickens how they have bigger things on their heads er nm5447: cones they're called cones i think aren't they sf5458: yeah nm5447: any chi-, chicken lovers here sf5457: the whole thing nm5447: perhaps that's sf5457: form of display the healthier the er peacock is going to be so nm5447: i think perhaps that sorry yeah i think that perhaps answers the conundrum they are displays but behind those displays is health and fitness and vigour isn't it and perhaps that's you don't have to fight i mean fighting is one way of showing vigour and fitness and health and maybe another is a display okay got to where are we up to who's in the top groups have we have you done one no you haven't you've been very productive in the have you got anything else to say you were doing sex weren't you sf5457: territory nm5447: any other examples we haven't covered sf5457: we've got mating cycles nm5447: good yeah go on sf5457: er animals tend to have sort of seasons where they nm5447: that's a good point actually sf5457: er in the lunar world you don't have that nm5447: i think that is important from an evolutionary point of view did you hear that as a it-, it's that most mammals er i think their their sort of breeding receptivity and their cycle is basically an olfactory thing the right smells and they just go bananas you've seen this with dogs on heat it's just a sad thing to look at without getting involved for most mammals [laughter] most mammals are a bit like this you know their and it's their seasoning and they only get interested when the right smells are about and and that is a cyclic thing an attraction and all and all the sort of the paraphernalia that goes with sex is only relevant for small parts of small segments of their life whereas in cer-, in primates and human beings the shift has gone to the visual the olfac-, olfactory stimuli are not very important in in in attraction it's things you can see so baboons with his huge great red bum or chimpanzees an-, and and you know whatever it is that turns people on is largely you know the example you've been given about sort of physical attractiveness in this are largely visual ones and certainly not olfactory ones power strength those sorts of things and and the and the game there is that the relevance of sex as a form of attraction is there all the time and can be an influence on institutions and on behaviour all the time so i think that is an important thing and i think that's a it's it's not a difference that separates us from all animals cause some primates and so on and birds as well i guess no birds get sort of feathers come at the right time of year they moult don't they but certainly some primates it's a it's a it's a largely a visual thing and i think that's quite a its a good distinction to make it's a sort of continuity and discontinuity er any any other examples were you doing sex or were you doing territory su: nm5447: doing sex were you the last group you haven't haven't said what what have you got anything have we used up all your ideas or is there anything more to add to this er sm5451: right er with animals it tends to be purely factors like the how well the the male can provide where-, whereas with people it tends to be there is a sort of underlying er what could be cultural factors a woman might want a husband who can provide for her and protect her but on top of that there'll be the sort of factors that she wants him to have you know short brown hair and blue eyes and stuff nm5447: mm sm5451: to wear a certain type of clothes have certain interest in that that kind of sort of thing nm5447: yeah look like particular role models looks like David Beckham [laughter] David Beckham's first touch you know er okay that's a good i mean that's a good point a lot of them are overlaid aren't they pers-, personal individual preferences er is that sm5451: cause we can't also we think that it's not just about reproduction there's someth-, maybe companionship where you also might be looking for people of similar inter-, similar interests nm5447: yes sm5451: whereas animals nm5447: yes sm5451: might not do nm5447: it's about relationships it's going to be a sort of symbolic thing isn't it in a symbolic world and that becomes relevant and you sort project the person into that yes er okay well we've just got quick poll then on the if we have to jump one way or the other on er mating behaviour and sex who's thinking that you know we're still just basically animal in this and what we're doing is essentially a slight human elaboration of a of a of an animalism hands er see if we can look round and estimate a number and who thinks that when we er enter the sort of realm of sex display an-, and so on that we're in a different realm and humans for humans it's a different set of issues er slightly the the more psychological social psychological one there but once agaain i guess it's got to be both we manu-, you know we are as i said at the beginning there's an evolutionary background and there's a sort of psychological development as well and er both have to be right both i think er okay does any everyone have any any-, anyone have any final questions about this er things we haven't said er okay er we've reached the end of our seminar in here so we'll meet up next time okay if i can shed any of you into a nine o'clock group or the other the other two of you might consider doing that er otherwise if you don't mind being a in a big group er could i could i have the copies back if you want to keep them keep them actually cause i er