nm1192: this is the first week of market analysis for this term and we're going into the marketing mix and the marketing mix comprises of pricing place promotion and product we're starting off with pricing issues how many of you have done accounting for finance courses before have done accounting courses yeah good don't worry about it i'm not going to ask you complicated questions i'm not going to pick on you er it doesn't the first of the the methods that we're going to talk about in terms of pricing is cost oriented pricing and it's the most obvious in a sense because it means that when you want to launch something into the market when you want to price something you start off by working out what it costs two methods both the variable costs so only those that are used by the product itself in making it labour materials and so on and the second choice which is why i asked if anyone had done accounting and finances course is the full cost method where you would actually absorb in the overheads and allocate the proportion of overheads to the product as well whichever of the methods of costing you use the marketers would say that there's a disadvantage to this method of pricing that is you start off working out that you need to cover your costs and maybe that you want to get a ten to fifteen or twenty per cent whatever margin out of the product but you don't take into account anything to do with the market itself what people are prepared to pay so you're starting off purely from the firm's point of view saying well we've got this product and we want to decide how we make a sufficient profit out of it and it's the equivalent really of the production oriented or the product oriented approach to marketing where we're saying the disadvantage of that is maybe you launch a product that's very clever er did you hear the example last term of Kevlar DuPont Kevlar was this incredibly clever fabric that was going to follow on from from Nylon and it was it's light and it's very strong and it's all of these other fine things and they invented it but they didn't have any idea what they were going to do with it and nobody in the market could actually find an application for Kevlar for so it was about several years after it had actually been invented that finally it started being used for things it's now used for a whole range of things bulletproof vests skateboards crash helmets boats so eventually it did find a a a gap in the market and it actually offered a benefit but when it was originally invented it was a classic product oriented thing that very clever but it may well not have succeeded now the cost oriented pricing method is is basically er the equivalent you start off saying i've got this product i have to decide what to price it at well if it was Kevlar you'd be saying we need to work out how much we've spent on developing it we need to know how much it costs to make it nm1192: so the markets would say the problem with this is that it's a classic supply side kind of way of pricing your products and the dangers of it are that you may actually sort of think that the market is going to not want to pay more for your product but actually you misunderstand the nature of the demand or you work out exactly what your costs would be and what margin you want and you put it into the market and it's so expensive that nobody actually buys it and you don't know whether it's the product or service that isn't valued by the market or whether the pricing is just wrong for it so we move towards methods where you actually take into account what's going on outside the firm and the first of those is com-, competition oriented pricing and what you would do there is look at comparable products that your competitors have in the market and say well what's their pricing and are we aiming to be at about the same rate or are we going to be at a premium above our competitors or are we trying to undercut our competitors and there may be a range of reasons why you would do that so if cost plus pricing is saying that you've got a cost and you want to charge a margin over and above that competition based pricing says that if i've got product A if i'm going to launch a new mobile phone into the market and it's already a competitive market and there's lots of different people out there charging X price per minute charging whatever rental for the phones nm1192: then i have to make some basic choices about what my strategy is and this is where marketing mix links back to things that you've already talked about so when you launch a new product when you're looking at your strategy for the market you have to decide what kind of objectives you have and that will largely determine your pricing strategy if you want for example to penetrate the market so you want to offer additional benefits over and above your competitors if you charge the same price as them for these additional benefits the likelihood is that you will actually gain a fairly high market share you will penetrate the market if you're very aggressive about your pricing and you really want to penetrate the market for whatever reason maybe you want to tie up the best distribution channels maybe you want to get your brand known in the market then you have the choice of undercutting the competition what's the danger of undercutting the competition sm1193: you're starting a price war nm1192: yeah and nobody ends up winning not so many years ago about five or six years ago i was talking to some of the banks and they were saying that in that market the only basis on which you could compete was on cost so the only thing you could do was to to cut out your bank charges or to lower your rate of interest or to improve the er interest that savers were going to get on their savings it was all to do with price and they all felt that to gain business from their competitors in that mature market they had to undercut the competition the danger of that was that people then begin to lo-, perceive that the price should be lower and lower and lower for that type of service nm1192: the danger if you undercut the competition is that you devalue what you're actually offering into the market and this was exactly what happened with holidays a few years back we would have looked at the brochure and worked out what kind of holiday we wanted what kind of destination we wanted what kind of budget we were on were we looking for upmarket tailor-made cheap and cheerful holidays but then we all got into the fact that you could actually get holidays cheaper and the reason why you were getting holidays cheaper is that they were actually selling their late availability holidays so the last minute holiday firms had had seats left on planes or hotel rooms vacant would reduce the price of those holidays and after a while once everybody began to know that you could get cheap holidays at the last minute [cough] we stopped paying full price we all started thinking that was about the price that you ought to pay for a holiday and we didn't book ahead and the firms found themselves getting less and less margin out of those holidays even those people who would have booked early started switching their behaviour so the danger of undercutting is that you set up a price war and nobody in terms of the firm the customer way may win because they get some bargains but from the firm's side nobody wins the alternative of course is if you really believe in the the benefits that your product provides that you should actually be charging premium for those benefits and so the third rate of pricing that that we talked about there is market oriented pricing and market oriented pricing is in a sense the opposite of cost oriented so rather than starting from the firm and looking out at the market and saying what price do we want to charge it's looking at the customers going right back to your marketing strategy and saying well what benefits do we offer and what do we think the price of those benefits should be to the market so what's the value of those things that we actually have designed into this product or service i'm going to give you an example of that the example has anybody done the John Deere case study no the example is to do with bulldozers John Deere bulldozers they wanted to launch their bulldozers John Deere were actually operating in the small bulldozer market that is less than a hundred horsepower and in the over a hundred horsepower they were up against some very strong competition they were up against people like Caterpillar they were up against people like Kamatsu and they wanted to launch into this market because basically they felt that they had as higher market share in the small bulldozer market as they could gain what they actually did was design a new product because they were in the smaller machine market they'd actually got very good at getting flexible manoeuvrable machines and when they went into the larger market they designed one that had a tighter t-, turning circle the tighter turning circle the tighter turning circle meant that you could gain ten to fifteen per cent productivity out of this machine suppose you were just better at picking things up and and and doing the job so it's ten to fifteen per cent increase in productivity when they had to launch into the market they had a pricing decision to make they could go in at the same price as Caterpillar Caterpillar were well established in the market they had strong distribution they had a good ca-, also spares network service and bear in mind if you're working on a large construction project you don't want your machine to break down so if you're building a a road or if you you're involved in some kind of building project you may well have penalty clauses if you don't deliver on time it's going to be very important to you that you actually have a reliable machine so Caterpillar had all of that established in the big bulldozer market John Deere were operating in a market that that was quite different the type of people using the machines was different there were jobbing builders there were they were one man building firms so quite often the person buying the machine for John Deere would be the person who was going to use it with the Caterpillar machines quite often there was a large project team involved it'd be a larger decision there'd be a whole team of people involved maybe one person deciding what ought to be commissioned one person doing the purchasing somebody else being the user so there's a whole series of things tied up in that not just what price John Deere should charge if you ask what price they should charge for the ten to fifteen per cent increase in productivity is there anybody who believes that they should charge less than Caterpillar and if so why no yes sm1194: er i think they should because established than Caterpillar nm1192: okay yeah so there is a logic that says if you go in at less than Caterpillar it's possible that people in that market will buy your machine now otherwise they may say why should i switch from Caterpillar i'm quite happy with them can anybody see any issues with charging less than Caterpillar yeah sm1195: they might just think that they're cheap and might be unreliable therefore [laughter] nm1192: yeah so there's a price quality relationship in people's minds quite often where you say why is it cheap i mean we're all sort of suspicious characters and quite often if you see something and it looks too good you think there's got to be a catch what's wrong with it now if they're going out saying there's a ten to fifteen per cent increase in productivity and they're going to charge less then Caterpillar what would you think about the ten to fifteen per cent increase in productivity yeah sm1196: ten to fifteen per cent decrease in reliability though nm1192: yeah you'd say well th-, can they really deliver that if they could really deliver that why would they be charging less than Caterpillar so you might be doing it for very strategic reasons but there are other issues to take into account one of which is price quality how about charging the same price as Caterpillar what do you think the market would think to that any offers sm1197: er they'd think it was better value nm1192: they would th-, sm1197: just think it's a better value nm1192: yes so that could really work because if you've got your ten to fifteen per cent increase in productivity and you go in at the same price as Caterpillar the market would say could say assuming they believe in this ten to fifteen per cent increase in productivity well that's actually very good value now you might actually not have quite the same drawbacks as you would have if you charge less than Caterpillar because people wouldn't be quite as suspicious they'd say well they're not charging less than Caterpillar they're charging the same price that would seem like a reasonable thing to do why do you think John Deere might decide to do that and it comes back to the point that you've just made sm1198: it's less of a decision between Caterpillar and John Deere nm1192: yeah see otherwise in this particular case John Deere are asking the buyers to take a lot on faith aren't they i mean they can take their bulldozer to i don't know whatever bulldozer exhibition and maybe they can demonstrate this increase in productivity they can come up with technical specifications and try to show those to their customers to say look we really can deliver this but to a a a set of buyers who are actually happy with Caterpillar who are concerned about reliability they've got to persuade them somehow to take the risk and buy their machine and if they are not offering a benefit over and above Caterpillar maybe the the buyers will not be convinced and not switch from their Caterpillar machine to John Deere what's the maximum price they could charge sm1199: market nm1192: yes market oriented pricing would say that the maximum you can charge is ten to fifteen per cent more than Caterpillar so ten to fifteen per cent you'd have to calculate what that is what a ten to fifteen per cent increase in productivity would mean and you could work it out if you had the figures for labour and and the basic the the purchase price of the machine the raw materials the spares that you've saved the labour costs and all of the other things that you would factor in you can work out what you save by a ten to fifteen per cent increased productivity ten to fifteen per cent more out of that machine over its lifetime and that would be the maximum price that you could charge and basically that ten to fifteen per cent more that's basically what we mean by market oriented pricing there's a a method of of calculation of prices the third method which is called economic value to the customer and rather than just say we're we are satisfying a set of needs and wants in the market you actually work out what the the price should be if you were offering those benefits over and above the price of your competition so you start off by benchmarking with the competition you take into account hopefully the strategic things about how will the market perceive you if you are cheaper if you're more expensive than your competition but you can work out what benefits you might be offering over and above the competition market oriented pricing therefore there's a whole series of things you would need to take into account some of which you've already brought out of John Deere first thing you'd have to have your marketing strategy now if you look at the car market and start off by saying what price can you charge for your product what would happen if you had Skoda quality and you charged Lexus prices sm1200: no one would buy it nm1192: nobody would buy it yeah what would happen if you had er Lexus quality and you charged Skoda prices sf1201: sell out nm1192: you'd sell out on the first day er what would you be doing to your company profits selling for far less than you you would need to i mean that's an extreme example but basically what we're trying to get to is the fact that the price that you can charge the market has to relate to the type of product the features that you're offering the quality that you're offering what quite of distribution you're selling it to all those other factors so you can't just sa-, decide your price in isolation that's what's wrong with cost oriented pricing that we saw at the beginning of course you almost always will want to cover your costs unless for some particularly strategic reason you want to get into a market fast and build a position and then you believe that you can put the prices up from there how easy is it to put your prices up once you've actually got into a market sf1207: very difficult nm1192: very difficult so that's what happened in the holiday example that we talked about earlier once the market accepts that and basically price quality once the market accepts that you would normally pay two to three-hundred pounds for a couple of weeks' holiday in Tenerife or wherever it's very difficult to go back and say well actually you used to pay four to five-hundred pounds and i want to charge you that now because the market's going to think well i'm getting the same thing i used to pay less for it why would i pay more and they're going to be very unhappy about that so you've got to look at your marketing strategy and relate to that but just before we we move on there's an interesting one what does a a mobile phone cost has anybody got a mobile phone here you're all going to deny it yes [laughter] i haven't got mine with me or i'd use it as an [laughter] example what does a mobile phone cost the actual handset sm1202: the phone itself costs ten pou-, well nm1192: ten sm1202: costs ten pounds but it costs three-hundred pounds to insure it [laughter] nm1192: yeah yes so this is the the thing about it i say that you would almost always want to cover your costs when you get into a market but mobile phones is one of the exceptions sometimes you'd pay ten pounds for the handset sometimes you wouldn't pay anything at all but as we're rightly saying there the actual cost of it what it costs the firm to make is something like three-hundred pounds why then would they charge you ten pounds or nothing at all for it sf1203: contract nm1192: and what about the contract sf1203: it's binding and it has to be nm1192: yeah sf1203: nm1192: and why if you've got to be a customer for a year why is that important in terms of price sf1203: i think that it keeps up with the consistent nm1192: so what they assume is that the the er the problem for them is getting people into the market is getting people to have a mobile phone if you either are contracted in or you're going to use a certain number of minutes over the year what they're assuming is that you're they're actually going to get their money back over the lifetime of the phone from the from the airtime and the contract and the various other things that they actually have with you does anybody maybe you're not old enough i'm certainly old enough when the mobile phone market in the U-K started off does anybody know what what handsets were were priced at to the customer then sm1204: it was in thousands wasn't it nm1192: sorry sm1204: it was in thousands wasn't it nm1192: it was in thousands but that was in the the the very early days my father-in-law had a mobile phone that was like you know [laughter] mobile phone and we once borrowed this thing it was like a suitcase er and and took it with us and the and the only time it was actually useful to us was go to was to go to the lakes the was the north-west of England and it's actually sort of reasonably mountainous so we took this thing thinking this'll be really useful and of course no chance of getting it to work because we just couldn't get a signal in fact you couldn't get a signal with it in virtually all of the country one of the things used to be actually getting getting the signal on analogue phones was not good news when the digital handsets first came into the market for consumer use which is relatively recently they were actually priced to the customer at around three-hundred pounds and what happened nobody bought them because people had had analogue phones and people by and large were reasonable happy with analogue digital came along and it's a bit like digital T-V now they were trying to get people into the market and people were looking at the prices saying well would i use it and the classic thing with mobile phones and i am a classical case of a mobile phone user 'cause i got my mobile phone for emergencies only and most of their customers say that to them well i don't i'm not sure i really need one but i'll get it for emergencies and i won't dial out on it much but i've got this certain number of free minutes you see and er i'll only use the free minutes and if the car breaks down or i'm going to be late or what i'll be able to ring people and then you start exceeding your free minutes and you realize it's not as expensive per minute as you thought it maybe was and then you use it more and more and more and it's a life cycle they want to get people in at the beginning because once you get into using your phones they actually make the money back have you seen the recent Orange advertising in the U-K i know there are inter-, international calls and whatever else what was what was the advertising before that can anybody remember the Orange community they had teams of rowing teams and they had families and whatever else because the latest thing that they're saying is in order if if the money comes out of the airtime what they want you to do now is is to have more handsets so don't just want you to have one they want you to have a whole set of them and then you're going to ring each other on your your phones and various other things you're going to give them er this is a great one to try on your parents the they they're going to give them to your teenage children who go off to university because it's cheaper than than getting people to use unreliable callboxes and and whatever and you can get a card and you put a certain number of minutes on it for a member of your family or or whatever to use their phone so there are all kinds of things that they're doing now to to lock people into those contracts you know what the most irritating thing is for the mobile phone providers given that they're giving you this three-hundred pound phone for ten pounds and i think when you said insurance you've probably got it er people because they assume it only to be worth ten pounds or nothing at all don't take care of their mobile phones i'm a classic case i haven't got a case for it yet i've always intended to have one it's it's covered in bits of Blu-tak you know bits of pen and things being in the bottom of the bag er people return them to their insurance departments with all kinds of ridiculous thing you know oh the kid's dropped it in the bath er [laughter] i spilt a can of Coke on it and one of the the classic ones that they've got someone who'd driven a nail into the top of their mobile phone trying to improve the reception on it [laughter] they were surprised that it didn't work after that so you have a marketing strategy which dictates what kind of price range you're going to be looking at and it c-, of course it relates back to your position and your features your quality and all of those other things there is a price quality relationship that you've got to take into account it's quite possible to pra-, to charge too little for a product as much as it's possible to charge too much because sometimes if you go into a market with something as we've said if you went in with your John Deere bulldozer and you charged less than the competition you might be asking people to to sort of not to trust in the value of your product in a way that you believe that it must be you know very good quality because you're paying a higher price you know that one of the classic cases of that to me is er we had a a carpenter come round the other day now we wanted a cupboard for our bathroom and we want it to fit a gap about this big and there is no pine chest of drawers that fits into that kind of space and so you go off to M-F-I or IKEA or whatever else you look at the size they're all about the same they're all about sort of twenty-something inches no way does it fit into the gap and eventually having looked in all the expensive shops for something tailor-made having looked at antiques having looked at all kinds we found somebody advertising in the Yellow Pages and he makes furniture and he brought us this catalogue of of beautiful chests that he'd made of things exactly to your requirements tailor-made he'd build it from scratch and then we asked him how much it was going to be for this chest of drawers and he was going to charge us something like er i don't know what his rate was ten pounds per hour for making this plus materials and if you worked out even though it's going to take him a few days to make it was going to be less than buying flat-pack furniture from IKEA or M- F-I or or wherever to get this tailor-made cupboard built much better than you would get from any of the the furniture wholesalers so he's taking a cost plus pricing method there he's working out what his time is he's working out his materials he's one of these incredibly honest characters who's going to charge us like thirty-something pence er for a for a a box of nails when you say well you know i'm not going to know it's thirty-seven-P if you charge me a pound or two pounds or whatever else probably not going to notice but he's going to charge you exactly what his labours are and that that's you know very honest of him but you feel like saying look ta-, take a take a pricing lecture and say [laughter] it's economic value to the customer i can't go out and buy this i can't buy it from IKEA or M-F-I at whatever price i've even looked in the expensive shops i you know five six seven up to a thousand pounds and you're going to charge me a hundred-and-fifty-pounds er sometimes the price sensitivity of the customer or the value that they're actually getting is much higher than the person is taking into account and that's one of the limitations of cost oriented pricing you can end up underpricing your services to the marketing or undervaluing what you actually have to offer of course you can also overvalue if you're John Deere and you say we've got a ten to fifteen per cent er advantage over the competition the competition has to be prepared to pay that and the problem that John Deere actually faced was they went at the higher end of the pricing range because of their ten to fifteen per cent increase in productivity and the market didn't really want to switch because they didn't fully believe that they could deliver that well what if the machine doesn't give us ten to fifteen per cent increase in productivity and we've switched away from Caterpillar and we've got to get the spares and will it be reliable and it how professional are their small er service units going to be and so on there's value to the customer competition as we've said the signal to the market in terms of your price quality and your value are very much tied in to the competition price if you're charging a premium over the competition you've got to be offering superior value if you're undercutting the competition well maybe you're doing that because you're offering less value or maybe you're doing it for some kind of strategic reason if you can persuade the customer that the value is there and the quality is there but you're charging less then you can stand a very good chance of achieving the objective of penetrating the market in terms of the pricing strategy you might be trying to achieve there's a range of different choices that you can make those choices relate to the price that you charge and the market share that you wish to gain if you charge a low price and you're offering value to the market obviously then at a low price you may well gain a high penetration of the market this is assuming that you have something that the customers want and that's the aims of the mobile phone producers they've lowered their price they're having digital technology and mobile wire-free phones something that they believe that the market wants but to actually penetrate that market to get enough people to take the mobile phones to make it viable i mean basically the they're they're putting their profits back if you talk about something like Orange they're not making massive profits or indeed any profit until recently because all the money is going back into building the network building the the signals so they can reach enough of the population and in order to get the money to do that they need to penetrate the market they need to get enough people to use the phones the other choice that you could make is to say well okay we charge full price for our mobile handset we charge three-hundred pounds for a digital phone or before it came into the consumer market we're charging a thousand- plus pounds for a an analogue phone at the time er for the business market and we know that only a few people will be able to afford that but if they're cha-, er charging if we're charging a high enough price and we're making a high enough margin on that then we can afford to skim the market so the opposite strategies there are penetration where you're getting a large market share and a relatively low margin or skimming where you're going to get a high margin from a small amount of the market another example of that would market penetration would be one of the mass market cars so it would be a a Fiesta or a Metro or a Mini or something like that er whereas with the skimming part of the market would be Lexus or one of the upmarket cars at the other end so you can you can have different approaches both of which would offer you a profit there is the possibility although it is only a possibility of having a high priced high market share product can you actually think of any examples of that where you charge a high price and gain a high market share there's one at the moment which is very dear to my heart having shopped around for Teletubby dolls couple of Christmases ago for my kids when they came into the market Teletubby dolls you just couldn't get it was a supply demand thing er and they were limiting it to one per customer you couldn't have all four 'cause it may you may not be the Teletubby market but believe me i've i've i've watched them you get very keen to watch them when your children are er are keen on Teletubbies you know all their names all the songs [laughter] these things cost er people have told me that they actually should retail out at th-, twenty-nine pounds because they were in such short supply when they first came into the market and they were a real fashion thing people were selling them on the black market trading them for hundreds of pounds so that their kids wouldn't be disappointed at Christmas the same thing's happened now with Beanie babies and Furbies and goodness knows what because they're fashion items they're fads they've really come into the market and they're gaining a high market share and for a short period of time the a lot of the market will buy them and they will buy them at a high price but it won't be sustainable it'll move onto something else and actually Teletubbies aren't demanding the price that they were that's almost a a sort of chance example you you can have a fad have you done product life cycle yet no product life cycle says that a product will be introduced into a market will grow gradually will mature and then eventually decline there's a product life cycle that goes with a fad and it goes it's it's it's not a gentle curve like that it's a triangular thing it goes sharp up and then sharp back down again because they grow very quickly but they decline very fast as well as something like a fad you can get examples of something which sells to a large amount of the market at a high price if it's something that we aspire to and a classic example of this does anybody here drink Schweppes Oasis no i know it's in the campus shop it was in the campus shop and it also sells at the various other bars and so on does anybody know by a chance what it costs or what kind of price you'd expect to pay per bottle sm1205: is it about seventy pence nm1192: it might be now it was marginally more than that it was about a pound a bottle at one stage certainly but it's relatively expensive compared to other it's a soft drink it's an adult soft drink compared to other adult soft drinks it's quite an expensive one when they actually entered the market with it when they launched it they believed it was going to be a niche product so they believed that what they were trying to do was skim the market and they were trying to be in that position there when they were charging a high price and they were going to get a small amount of the market that small amount of the market was going to be probably male probably er mid-twenties to mid-thirties single er gone out for the evening and the driver for the evening so driving home not able to drink much alcohol doesn't want to to be seen drinking cans of Coke all evening er and aspires maybe something a little bit more sophisticated so when they launched it into the market the idea was that it was a sophisticated soft drink and there's all kinds of background to that we are apparently a soft soft drinks generation actually i'm i'm i'm classing myself in the same generation as you i'm i was a sort drinks generation you're second generation soft drinks users my parents' generation as they got to adulthood they switched towards drinking tea and coffee they didn't drink soft drinks we've grown up with cans of Coke and cans of Sprite and and Seven-up whatever else and we've got into the habit of drinking soft drinks and we continue to drink them when we get to adulthood we start drinking more sophisticated things so you go out if you don't drink Oasis you might go out and have a glass of mineral water sparkling mineral water what kind of price do you pay for mineral water in a bar it's ridiculous you can you can pay two three pounds for a glass of mineral water where you pay you know one-pound-fifty two pounds for a large bottle of mineral water in a supermarket but that kind of market the the drinking in the evening adult sophisticated drinks is quite a a premium priced skimming market when Oasis launched that's where it thought it was going to be on pricing strategy does anybody know what happened to it does anybody know who drinks it [laughter] well the answer is you're probably too old er because although they thought they were going for twenty-five to thirty-five er reasonably sophisticated males what actually happened was they started advertising it in all the types of places you would need to to get it to that audience so they were putting it in in various of the magazines not that they were just targeting males targeting females as well so they were putting it in She and Mizz and and they put it on Capital Radio's Hall of Fame and various other types of advertising and the people who saw it and the people who aspired to it weren't the twenty-five to thirty-five year olds they were the sixteen year olds because the sixteen year olds thought it must be a sophisticated drink and they weren't old enough to go out to bars and drink so well not officially er [laughter] so they were going out and they were buying it from garage forecourts and newsagents and things like that because Oasis was was something that was trendy to drink for a pound per bottle and what they actually ended up with was a high market share high priced product and at one point in the U-K Oasis had seventy per cent market share so it was massive and Frutopia and Snapple who were its rivals basically Frutopia who's owned by Pepsi pulled out of the market said i can't compete with this product even though it's owned by a very big name because they've got such market share now what you're telling me seems to be that that market is dying out of popularity too but for a time at least it achieved the virtually impossible position of high market share and high price the ideal for all firms in terms of profit the opposite end of the market you get somebody who's got a low price and a low market share and my guy making chest of drawers for the the bathroom at very low prices is probably in that part of the market it's a niche the niche which is probably serving the declining market the end of the product life cycle quite often let me think what else would be in there then if it's serving declining markets something like black and white television would also be in that part of the pricing strategy something where there aren't many people left who want to use it but there are some and those people who are the ones who want to use it are probably there because they can't afford to trade up to the newer technologies that have come in they are in their current life cycle terms the laggards i always thought that was a very sort of unflattering term they are the laggards [laughter] i just it always sounds great if you're called innovator or a whatever else but being called a laggard somehow is bit kind of er it's about as as good as being called a dog isn't it in the er purely in in Boston Consultancy Group Matrix terms [laughter] so there's a niche at that part of the market too market orientated price index it's to do with what price your competition are charging apart from some rare examples one of which we've just had there with the mobile phones you're going to want to cover your costs there may be situations where you've got to negotiate the margins because all of this that we've talked about so far is implying that you're dealing directly with your end customer now the other parts of the the marketing mix that we're going to look at next week we're going to talk about place place actually is largely about your distribution channels how you actually get your products to the market and if you're going via a retail multiple if you're going via a car dealership you may not able be able to set your prices as you wish so even if you're taking into account your quality even if you're saying what are we offering the market what are our competition doing what's our value there's somebody else an intermediary between you and the customer in this case if you're talking about something like food retailing you're talking in the U-K about five chains who have eighty-something per cent of all the distribution of food and clearly as there's only five firms who control all of that market they've got a lot of power i used to work for Unilever before i became an academic and er it got to the stage where if those five firms didn't want to list your new product when you actually w-, had an idea and you were going through the process of launching it in the market thought you may as well not introduce it because you were left trying to get it listed by something like ten to to fifteen per cent of the market and you knew if your strategy as we've said before was to penetrate the market you knew that you weren't going to be able to do that you could at best get a niche position so that was okay if it was a premium product but it wasn't if it was something that you were aiming at the mass market you just wouldn't get the distribution if the channel wants to make the maximum margin so Sainsbury's or Tesco's want to make as much money as they can out of something like Schweppes Oasis and also the firm making it wants to you can't both put on the margin you want to and add it up and and then sell it out to the market 'cause what would happen if you did that think back to the the competition sm1206: maybe it would just undercut it nm1192: sorry sm1206: maybe it would just undercut it nm1192: yeah well i mean basically what what you'd be doing is you'd be charging a lot more for no apparent added value because in the channel they'd put on the margin you'd put on the margin you'd be double counting that you'd be making it more expensive than the competition for no more value people wouldn't buy it and rightly as you say if there's competition between retail chains if you both hang on to the fact that you want to make say twenty per cent margin for your product a competitive chain can sell it cheaper you're not going to sell your product people are going to start switching to somewhere else so it's in nobody's interest it's not in the producing firm's interest it's not in the retail chain chain's interest what they have to do is be sensible in the negotiation of the margin so to get and and quite often what happens is they have a price point that they have in mind for a product what they're going to sell it at and they have to work back how much profit each of the the people in the the channel are going to make i'll just summarize the price quality relationship issues what we're saying is there are different types of relationship between price and quality that you can have if your quality is high and your price is is high that is a classic premium strategy so remember when we're talking about competitive pricing we were saying you couldn't charge a premium over and above competition you can do that if your quality is high if you have medium quality and you want to charge a high price you you're in one of two positions you're either slightly overcharging because if you're charging a very high price for something which is a a m-, a moderate quality then you're slightly overcharging and the likelihood is that if there's something better in the market that the competitors the customers are not going to buy it if you're charging a medium price for very high quality you get the opposite effect it's very good value if for some bizarre chance like the person making furniture for our bathroom and basically because he doesn't look at what the market's prepared to pay you're actually offering very high quality for a low price then what you're offering is a superb value strategy as a matter of interest we actually went back to him and told us he ought to be charging us more because we felt that i mean i don't want to pay at the top end of the scale but we were prepared to pay more than you know at least the equivalent of of buying it flat-pack er and he wouldn't accept it he just didn't believe us that you could actually charge more than that to the market so there are people who are superb value the opposite extreme is if you've got a poor quality and you're charging a high price that's a classic rip-off strategy and i suppose you're sitting there thinking well you know when would that happen you you wouldn't buy would you but there are instances when you would have you ever been stuck in an airport anybody been stuck in an airport anybody been stuck outside the station waiting for a taxi you've missed the last bus or the last train er it's raining er and there's a taxi there how price sensitive are you assuming you've got money sufficient money in your pocket you'll pay whatever you need to pay to get home if you've been stuck in an airport for long enough and it's hot you're waiting for your flight and you want a drink you'll go and you'll pay well over the odds for that that drink that kind of pricing strategy only works it's called opportunistic it only works if they're not relying on somebody coming back to them again so if they think they're never going to see you again they can overcharge you they can rip you off once er if you do that to a customer i mean the basis of marketing really is on repeat business if you do that to a customer more than a certain number of times they're just not going to come back to you and of course in the middle of those you can s-, have medium quality and and a high price is is sort of poor value rather than a rip-off er that niche position we saw where you had a low market share and a low price for something like black and white television is is the economy end of the market and there's also a niche of the market in quite a lot of sectors so there's a niche cheap car market for Lada or or Skoda or whatever there's a niche er cheap food market for Kwik Save Aldi Netto and so on so i-, in quite a lot of markets there is an economy position you can take as well as a premium position if you go for an economy pricing strategy it can only be on the basis really that you want to char-, you want to sell a lot of units so you want to penetrate the market and make a profit in that way okay we can leave it there for today thank you